What type of reasoning would you use to resolve an ethical dilemma?

In addressing an ethical dilemma, moral reasoning is the appropriate type to use because it involves evaluating the principles of right and wrong that govern an individual's behavior. This reasoning process requires one to consider moral values, cultural norms, and the potential consequences of different actions in order to arrive at a decision that aligns with ethical standards.

Moral reasoning encompasses various ethical theories, such as consequentialism, deontology, virtue ethics, and others, allowing a person to analyze a situation based on moral principles. For instance, it could involve weighing the rights and responsibilities of those affected by the decision, the implications for justice and fairness, and the potential outcomes of various courses of action.

On the other hand, logical reasoning focuses more on structures of arguments and validity rather than moral implications. Abstract reasoning deals with concepts and relationships that are not concrete, which doesn't directly apply to ethical decision-making. Empirical reasoning relies on observation and evidence, which are valuable in many contexts but may not adequately address the moral dimensions inherent in ethical dilemmas. Thus, moral reasoning is distinctly suited for this purpose as it centers on the ethical considerations that underpin such situations.