Which theory simplifies society into two conflicting groups?

Marxist Theory is grounded in the idea that society can be understood primarily through the lens of economic class conflict. This theory posits that societies are divided into two main groups: the bourgeoisie (the ruling class or capitalists who own the means of production) and the proletariat (the working class who sell their labor). The fundamental conflict between these two groups arises from their opposing interests—capitalists seek to maximize profit, while workers strive for better wages and working conditions.

By focusing on this dichotomy, Marxist Theory highlights the inherent struggles within capitalism and how these struggles drive societal change. The implications of this theory extend to many aspects of social structure, culture, and even politics, as it emphasizes the ways in which economic power shapes societal dynamics.

Other theories, such as Functionalism, explore the interconnections and roles of various parts of society without emphasizing conflict. Similarly, Symbolic Interactionism concentrates on individual interactions and meanings rather than large-scale group dynamics. While Conflict Theory also addresses societal conflicts among varied groups, it doesn't necessarily confine itself to just two opposing factions as strongly as Marxist Theory does. Thus, the choice of Marxist Theory accurately reflects the simplification of society into two conflicting groups based on economic class relations